ALL WORK MUST BE ORIGINAL. IF YOU LIKE TO PLAGIARIZE/PARAPHRASE, PLEASE DO NOT BID ON MY ASSIGNMENT AND WASTE EACH OTHER TIME. I USE TURNITIN AND WILL DETECT UNORIGINAL WORK AND WILL WITHDRAW.
Initial Assignment Memo Draft
Your writing Assignment in this unit is a memo addressed to your professor requesting permission to move forward with your researched proposal topic idea. Use this Discussion forum to practice presenting your idea by writing a paragraph of 200–300 words persuading your decision-maker (your professor) that your idea is a good one, and justify your request with research. Cite at least two sources (remember your APA in-text citation and accompanying references from Unit 2 Discussion) you will be incorporating into your researched proposal to show your audience (your professor) research is available to support your topic.
Assignment: Memo Request to Pursue Research
Typically, before a writer would expend energy on a researched proposal, he or she would ask for permission from a decision-maker to start their project. You practiced writing a short persuasive memo in Units 1, 2, and Unit 3 Discussion. Now use what you learned in terms of persuasive writing in this Assignment. You will write a memo to your professor requesting permission to move forward with your topic for the researched proposal, and provide evidence to support the viability of your topic.
OYSTER SHELL RECYCLING
1. Contains no fewer than 500 and no more than 750 words
2. Follows correct memo format, including headings
3. Describes the problem or project you want to work on and explains its significance; describes the benefits of the research to the organization
4. Integrates at least two viable sources into the request to demonstrate research is available to support the topic. APA formatted in-text and References page citations are required.
5. Contains no grammatical* or mechanical errors
Please Keep Part 1 and Part 2 and Part 3 in three different word documents and use different sources for parts 1 and 2. Also include in text citations.
Video Reflection Discussion
Evan Thomas, former editor at large for Newsweek, shares strategies for student writers to improve their writing. You will reflect on the advice Thomas provides in this Discussion.
Access the Transcript here:
Since we’re in the online world uh, obviously you’re going
to write a lot of emails. There’s a tendency, a temptation to
get sloppy about it uh, to, to just kind of whip it off. You
should use the same standards when you’re writing an email,
particularly to a boss or a client or a customer, you should use
the same standards you would use writing a letter. In other
words, obey all the rules that we’ve been talking about. Write
clearly and simply, but write properly. Use proper English.
Don’t abbreviate a lot. Uh, make sure you capitalize letters.
Treat it just as if you were writing a letter, a formal letter,
say a job application and don’t get sloppy and lazy. Because
uh, it can come back to haunt you if you don’t think through a
problem or you’re uh, have too much attitude or maybe you say
something that’s insulting or offensive boy that can come back
and bite you. And there’s a temptation to do it because when
you write your emails to your friends you’re writing in a breezy
way. When you’re in business write like a business person,
A couple of other points about word choice and the words
you actually use. Use active verbs. Don’t use passive verbs.
He ran the race. Not, the race was run by him. It’s stronger.
It’s more muscular. It’s more direct. Has more action, more
energy if you use active verbs. So whenever you can nick out
those passive verbs and use the active, use active muscular uh,
verbs. Uh, readers will appreciate it uh, it will give a life
to your uh, uh, to your memo or to your piece that would be lost
if it’s all feels sort of passive and, and slow moving.
Uh, by the same token be very careful of jargon and
uh, what I would call uh, uh, three syllable words that don’t
really mean anything, that a one syllable word, a simpler uh,
word wouldn’t — where a simple word wouldn’t suffice. There’s
a writer I mentioned earlier, William Zinzer who is an expert
uh, in this area and I’m just going to read you a paragraph that
he’s written about uh, the tendency to use jargon and to use uh,
complex words where simple words will suffice.
This is uh, I’m quoting here from On Writing Well by William
Zinzer. I could go on quoting examples from various fields, Zinzer
Every profession has its growing arsenal of jargon to throw
dust in the eyes of the populace, but the list would be tedious. The
point of raising it now is to serve notice that clutter is the enemy.
Beware then of the long word that’s no better than the short word;
assistance, help, numerous, many, facilitate, ease, individual, man or
woman, remainder, rest, initial, first, implement, due, sufficient,
enough, attempt, try, referred to as, called, and hundreds more.
Beware of all the slippery new fad words; paradigm and parameter,
prioritize and potentialize. They are all weeds that will smother
what you write. Don’t dialog with someone you can talk to. Don’t
interface with anybody
What two points in the Thomas transcript for this unit strike you as most significant in guiding e-mail communication? Why?