Phase 2: Communication plan
Question description
Need 3 to 4 pages
Phase 2: Communication plan – due in week 5
In this phase, you need to communicate with your troops about the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, through your information in the memo. The communication plan should involve a diagram showing the flow of information, the timing of the communication as well as the media of the communication. You also need to submit drafts of any communication pieces of your communication plan.
Phase 2 grading will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the communication plan, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 25 | Case Study | |||
Criteria | Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Demonstrate the communication plan visually Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely demonstrated the communication plan visually | Partially demonstrated the communication plan visually | Satisfactorily demonstrated the communication plan visually | Thoroughly demonstrated the communication plan visually |
2. Analyze how to manage risk Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how to manage risk | Partially analyzed how to manage risk | Satisfactorily analyzed how to manage risk | Thoroughly analyzed how to manage risk |
3. Communicate how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission | Partially communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission | Satisfactorily communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission | Thoroughly communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission |
4. Ensure an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Partially ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Satisfactorily ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Thoroughly ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term |
5. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |